<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is this &#8220;we&#8221; I keep reading about?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kneedeepinthehooah.com/2009/02/whos-we/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kneedeepinthehooah.com/2009/02/whos-we</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:46:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://www.kneedeepinthehooah.com/2009/02/whos-we/comment-page-1#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kneedeepinthehooah.com/?p=2929#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>So you are saying, Kat, that in a socialist system those who do the redistribution of the wealth do not set up a system that keeps them in power, keeps them a little fatter off the cream? I don&#039;t buy it. I also do not buy that any form of government will ever work as nicely in practice as it does in theory. In theory there is no difference between the two -- in practice, however, the difference is huge. Outside of communism and total control I think we almost always see variations. The welfare system in our Country is most definitely a form of taking taxes from the working class and redistributing them to those on a lower social strata. How is that not socialism? Public housing, food stamps, government clinics AND public insurance (which we already have). 

I do know what Candidates stand for. I do the research. Once again, why is the assumption made that if I don&#039;t agree with your view point then I must not be informed or I must be some media puppet? 

There is more to socialism than just redistributing wealth. 

&quot;Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases.&quot; Jefferson

Sometimes we don&#039;t know what we have until it&#039;s gone. It&#039;s one thing when that is a few conveniences, it&#039;s another when it&#039;s our freedom and liberty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you are saying, Kat, that in a socialist system those who do the redistribution of the wealth do not set up a system that keeps them in power, keeps them a little fatter off the cream? I don&#8217;t buy it. I also do not buy that any form of government will ever work as nicely in practice as it does in theory. In theory there is no difference between the two &#8212; in practice, however, the difference is huge. Outside of communism and total control I think we almost always see variations. The welfare system in our Country is most definitely a form of taking taxes from the working class and redistributing them to those on a lower social strata. How is that not socialism? Public housing, food stamps, government clinics AND public insurance (which we already have). </p>
<p>I do know what Candidates stand for. I do the research. Once again, why is the assumption made that if I don&#8217;t agree with your view point then I must not be informed or I must be some media puppet? </p>
<p>There is more to socialism than just redistributing wealth. </p>
<p>&#8220;Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have &#8230; The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases.&#8221; Jefferson</p>
<p>Sometimes we don&#8217;t know what we have until it&#8217;s gone. It&#8217;s one thing when that is a few conveniences, it&#8217;s another when it&#8217;s our freedom and liberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

