Entries Tagged as 'EcoHype'

Gore challenges US to ditch oil

The title of the article really is “Gore Challenges US to Ditch Oil.”

Now, let me ask you, wouldn’t it be more feasible for Gore to challenge himself to give up oil and his own dependency on fossil fuels first (in order to show us how it’s to be done), or will this be another carbon credit deal where the rich and powerful get to keep the convenience and the rest of us schmucks get to give up for the sake of the universe? Of course the word “tax” was used in the plan.

Bah. The political arena of today is stranger than fiction. You couldn’t make this stuff up!

Link to BBC article

My last BPA Update - I Swear!!

I spotted this piece today and just can’t help myself … I have to link to it for you from Fox News:

Junk Science: Anatomy of a Chemical Murder
Thursday, April 24, 2008
By Steven Milloy
Wal-Mart announced last week that it would stop selling baby bottles made with the chemical bisphenol A, or BPA.

In the past, I would have laid the blame for this junk science-fueled shame at the feet of anti-chemical environmental jihadists, their pseudo-scientist henchmen at universities and government regulatory agencies and Wal-Mart’s knuckleheaded executives, who seem to be more interested in appeasing eco-pressure groups than reassuring consumers the products the retailer has sold for decades are safe.

But the banning of baby bottles made with BPA is so mind-bogglingly baseless that I just have to lay the blame where it truly belongs — with the lame-o chemical industry, which utterly failed to defend its product against activist claims and a regulatory process so specious it would cause voodoo practitioners to shudder.

Oh my. Now you see why I had to read this one. I wasn’t dissappointed. I won’t give the ending away but it made me stop to think a little about the timing on this one.

Surely, surely, there are not those in corporate America that would willingly sacrifice polycarbonate and sound science on the alter of the left in order to steal that market and increase their own profits. Would they? Really!? I hate sounding like a lefty but I do think there is a money trail to be followed here.

Mr.Hooah!, out. (probably for the weekend)

A Voice in the Wilderness - BPA Update

Believe it or not the Washington Times has a very good article update on the new evil: BPA.

Here’s the link, excerpt, and update in one toasty block quote:

Plastic hysteria strikes again
By Gilbert Ross, M.D.
April 24, 2008
A new health scare — over the safe and useful plastic component, bisphenol-A (BPA) — has taken wing, fomented by the usual suspects: “experts” in rat toxicology working with alarmist, chemical-hating “environmental” activists and self-serving media scaremongers. Soon, we know all too well, will come the plaintiffs’ lawyers to “protect” the public from the non-existent (but lucrative) threats lurking in our plastic bottles.

And more:

The facts buried in the report are quite the opposite of the newspaper headlines. There is no cause for concern, much less alarm, over the tiny exposures we face from plastic bottles made with BPA. The hysteria, aggravated by reports of moms nationwide throwing out “toxic” baby bottles with the number 7 on them, is based (as usual) on rat tests and “general themes” of toxicity, rather than on anything approaching scientific evidence.

Ah, I love it when other experts agree with me. Thank you Dr.Ross. However, the lawsuits have begun (clicky here)!!

Read the article. Spread the love. Mr.Hooah!, out.

Help! I’ve been eco-napped!

I was walking through the store the other day when I realized what was once a known experience for me has become alien and strange. I have been a mom for 23 years, and within those two-decades and three-years I have been the sole grocery acquisition specialist. Oh the stories I could tell of my hours spent cross comparing brands to check for quality and value. The labels I have read, the boxes I have tossed atop a loaded basket, and the cookies I have used to bribe tired children in order to get through the check out and to the car before a total melt down ensued. Yes, I am the Royalty of Retail, the Mistress of the Market, the Vixen of Vending!

A couple of weeks ago I slid my feet into my favorite pumps, clasped on my best pearls and headed out to the grocery store in order to buy delicious and nutritious food for my troops, not to mention the need to replenish the wonderful supplies that sit under my kitchen sink that keep the entire household sanitized and smelling wonderful. Our clothes are white, bright and we smell like lavender-white-lily-roses -on-a-sunny-May-morning. I needed to get more of that liquid miracle maker that keeps the sheets of a potty training toddler smelling April fresh!

I arrive at the Kroger. I am in my zone. I crack my knuckles and wrap my limbered hands around the push bar on the grocery cart. I begin to guide my cart with the precision that only a seasoned shopper possesses. I started down the ethnic food aisle when I begin to notice that the really small changes I had noticed in shopping trips of the past were accumulating and changing my shopping experience. Sure, I had noticed the little “Eco” this and “Eco” that on bottles. It took a while, but the small, slow and subtle changes finally took full effect this past week. It looked like the Eco-Fairy had fluttered through the local Kroger and vomited a bunch of glittering eco-hype all over my once normal grocery store.

Oh geez! Where does a grocery-goddess go to get a real sized bottle of liquid detergent for a reasonable price? What is this new fad of shrinking bottles with price tags that go in the opposite direction of the size and volume of the product? I could only assume it was the work of the Eco-Fairy. Anytime there is a little hype put out about a particular subject we suddenly have a whole new media induced fad that winds up screwing up my grocery budget.

A bottle of my favorite detergent used to weigh more than my 7-month old baby, but it cost less than diapers for the tot. Now that same brand weighs as much as a loaf of bread, and it cost me as much as a month’s tuition at the now grown tot’s college. Thanks. Thanks a lot Eco-Fairy. I appreciate that. What has really changed in that detergent? Nothing really. They claim it is more “concentrated” now. Essentially they removed the extra water they used to dilute it with, put the same amount of product into a small Barbie sized bottle, slapped an “eco-friendly” label on it and raised the price so high that even Mr. Clean can’t afford to do his laundry these days.

What other products have I noted the same change in? Cleaners of course! Yep. Smaller bottles, bigger price tags. I did vomit a little when I walked by the soup isle and I saw a Campbell’s Soup can with an “eco friendly” label! So, how does a soup become more environmentally friendly? Simple. They change nothing at all, slap a green label on a can and then charge the poor sucker-consumer (a.k.a ME) the cost to be in on the trend. Oh, we can find eco-friendly popcorn, eco-friendly shampoo, conditioner, flour, sugar, mac and cheese, and just about any other product under the sun that could possibly be given a green label and a price hike. The company does not need to change the product. They only need to put on a fancy green label (I will let my husband a.k.a. “Polymer-Man” tell you why the green dyes used to make those labels are not good for the environment).

What will be held hostage next by the Eco-Fairy? I think that the recent hype around plastics in the media is a good hint. Now we have stores who are already jumping on the bandwagon so that they can claim to be a “BPA Free” store. Guess what? They were already, more than likely, a “mostly-BPA-free” store. Now, they will get to claim to be more “child and family friendly” than their competitor, and since the media has done such a good job scaring the crap out of people, the store can raise its prices since they have had to do, oh so much, to accommodate consumer fears. Baby bottles will now have new labels declaring them as “BPA FREE!” Even though they were already BPA Free before the hype. Of course the exact same bottle will wind up costing you three-times more now.

If you really want to get this domestic-doll all fired up then whisper sweet nothings in my ear about mercury laden light bulbs. I can see the ads now:

Save the environment! Kill your children by putting these light bulbs throughout your house! You too can now own the light bulbs that use less energy to burn! Of course mercury is a heavy metal that is a known hazard to humankind, it causes birth defects and permanent brain damage, but the environment will thank you for it! Well, not really because mercury is also bad for the envrionment — but it’s good for the company pushing this light bulb and Al Gore thinks it’s a pretty darn groovy idea too!

Every time I see Al Gore talk about “Carbon Credits” I have flashbacks of having the crap scared out of me as a kid while watching Return of the Living Dead. He may be proof positive that mercury light bulbs are a really bad idea!

By the way, did they ever establish the mortifying connection between cell phones and brain tumors? Lavender and breast development in boys? Power lines and three headed babies? The Achy-breaky heart dance and attention deficit disorder?

Funny isn’t it? These scare-driven fads “come on like a flame and then turn a cold shoulder.” Why is that? Maybe because past the hype there is not much substance or evidence. Or, maybe we get bored with it when we begin to realize the green can of soup only made a difference in how much we paid and not a single thing more. So we anxiously wait for the next wave of hype so we hang ten - or just pay ten-dollars more.

I could have had a V-8! Only with this current hype, put a lot of Vodka in mine. Make that Skyy Vodka, please.

More Irresponsible Reporting - Update(added at bottom)

I’m a day late on this but what the heck …

I want to say one more thing about our MSM (call me butter ’cause I’m on a roll) hype and “the sky is falling” lies from the Old Media (that’s MSM or Main Stream Media). I like the new name “Old Media” because it connotes something passing away. Yes, it does. You know, all plastic is evil and you are all going to die. That’s pretty much what the Old Media would have you believe.

Too bad I have a degree in chemistry, over a decade in plastics research, and dozens of patents on the subject. That’s too bad because it means I get to call the Old Media out for the pack of sycophantic lazy liars that they are. There is plenty of truth to be had on the subject, but do they take the time to look it up? Even one simple Google search? Heck no! I have to wonder, what do they do all day as they are obviously NOT doing any journalistic research. It looks like they simply receive a sound bite from some alarmist pal of theirs, report it as truth, and then go hang out in the local park trying to pick up other girly men.

The following excerpt is linked to a simple refutation and history of the “plastic” problem:

Facts About Plastics
Unfortunately it seems there is more misinformation than facts about the safety of plastics in the general media today. Just last week, NBC aired two segments on its Today Show that had several inaccuracies. So far, NBC has not granted a request by the American Chemistry Council (the chemical company trade association of which Eastman is a member) for equal air time to counter the allegations aired last week. ACC has set up a website to address confusion and fear generated by the recent media coverage and to make facts easily available. FACTS ON PLASTIC

The author is, of course, more diplomatic than me. No surprise there, eh? I call folks like those of the Today Show and their NBC masters a pack of liars. Their “misinformation” is a nice word for “lie”. Get educated folks:

1. The Today Show said that the resin identification codes (also known as recycling codes) on the bottom of plastic bottles are a safety designation. That’s a stupid lie. In reality, the numbers 1 to 7 only aid the sorting of materials for recycle. Aren’t we all supposed to love recycling? Here’s a complete list of those codes: LINK

2. The Today Show “urged caution” when using plastics marked with recycling symbols 3, 6, and 7 because of an alleged concern with BPA (bisphenol-A). They pretty much said, “Don’t use them. You’ll die. Your children will die.” But the American Chemistry Council and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have publicly stated that BPA is NOT a risk to human health at the extremely low levels of which consumers MIGHT be exposed. Moreover, a large number of those plastics marked 3, 6, and 7 DO NOT contain BPA at all. More importantly, those plastics not typically recycled will have NO CODE stamped on them. Don’t worry. Most of those don’t contain BPA either. Lastly, if you’re over 22 yrs old even high levels of BPA will not be very risky for you. Unless of course you choke eating spoonfuls of the stuff.

3. The Today Show and other media reports continue to propound that plastics are unsafe to use in the microwave. This myth will simply not die. Why is that? The plastics industry has extensively publicized the best method for using plastics in microwaving on its plasticsinfo.org website. Naturally, if you are one of those that practically melt your plastic in the microwave then wonder why it smells funny, tastes funny, and doesn’t last as long as your other cookware you might have a problem. You might also huff magic markers.

If you are really nervous about BPA where your kids are concerned then do not buy baby bottles made from Acrylic. Many of the bottles will now say BPA Free. Those bottles probably never contained it in the first place but the marketing folk know a bonanza when they see one, and so do the media types!

Is it any wonder that newspapers are dying? Is it any wonder that the Old Media continues to lose its relevance? The latest frenzy on plastics is more proof of the Old Media’s irresponsible reporting habits. They simply lie. So why do we bother to listen?

The sky is falling? No, the Old Media is falling. Now that’s entertainment. Mr.Hooah, out.

-Update Added-

I just found this little tid bit on the American Chemistry Council website under the title “Today Show reverses 40 years of industry science strikes needless fear in millions” :

NBC: Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC Chief Medical Editor, recommended a website as “one of the best” for consumer information.
Fact: The website is neither objective nor non-biased regarding plastics. To the contrary, it is operated by an organization that employs a staff member who testifies regularly in efforts to ban BPA in products. This site terms PVC the “toxic plastic” and expresses views on health risks from plastics which in general are one-sided. Much of the scientific peer-reviewed and published information about plastics is not acknowledged, and sometimes disparaged, on this site. It is an international trade policy advocacy site — not an impartial or complete science site, let alone a source for the science and chemistry of plastics’ safety.

Oh, the bias is just too obvious. In fact it is blatant and in our face. But do they care? No. So, the other morning shows picked up on the hype. NPR picked up on the hype. I’m even seeing this garbage mindlessly picked up and touted by my local TV station.

I just have to wonder … other than the obvious attack on plastic (which is considered one of the great evils by lefties) what else prompted this preemptive lie at this particular time? More pointedly, who stands to make money through these lies?? Is it really all about the ratings? What is it?

Living Life Upside Down?

I don’t know why this song was on my mind the other day, other than for the sheer fact that I have been reading a lot of news lately. There are some days where I just shake my head and have to wonder where all of the current turmoil will land us all in the long run. We have law breaking anarchist shutting down military recruiting centers, vandalizing them, and thumbing their noses at the law, while the law makers sit back and watch (and in Berkeley the supposed law makers even participate in the chaos). It’s hard to not become discouraged. Today, we are going to a nice, quiet, relaxing spot to just enjoy one another and some great exhibits (animal and nature). After that, who knows? Naps may be required! I hope you all have a beautiful day!

Here’s the song that’s been running through my mind. It’s not a cheerful song, but a good sobering reminder of the importance of being mindful of those around us. If we want to look back with no regrets at the end of our lives, I am becoming more convinced as I age, that it’s essential to be less and less absorbed with self, and more absorbed with the needs of those around us.

“Greater love hath no man…”

Living Life Upside Down
lyrics by Russ Lee

John has a new way of looking at life
He’s tired of his job, his kids and his wife
He says the secret to his success
Was in leaving and finding himself
Now he’s someone to somebody else.
And you say we’ve risen to a new age of truth
You’re calling it a spiritual Godly pursuit
But I say, I say,

(chorus)
What if we’ve fallen to the bottom of a well
Thinking we’ve risen to the top of a mountain
What if we’re knocking at the gates of hell
Thinking we’re heaven bound
What if we spend our lives thinking of ourselves
When we should have been thinking of each other
What if we reach up and touch the ground
To find we’re living life upside down.

We’ve got a program for saving the earth
While unborn children are denied their right to birth
One baby’s blessed, another cursed
Have we made this world better or worse
Now that the life of a tree comes first
And you say we’ve risen to a new age of light
You’re telling me what used to be wrong is now right
But I say, I say,

What if we’re living, what if we’re living,
What if we’re living life upside down.